April 23, 2026

The Health

Your health, your choice

CMS proposes excluding chart reviews from MA risk scoring in 2027 payment rule

CMS proposes excluding chart reviews from MA risk scoring in 2027 payment rule

This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

The Trump administration has taken a big step toward curbing Medicare Advantage overpayments, proposing a rule that would stamp out one strategy insurers use to inflate their members’ sicknesses to get higher reimbursement in the privatized Medicare program.

In a rule released Monday, the CMS proposed excluding patient diagnoses that aren’t linked to actual medical care from MA risk adjustment.

The policy would eliminate the financial motivation insurers have to mine their members’ medical charts for additional diagnoses, since insurers wouldn’t be able to use those additional diagnoses to inflate members’ risk scores.

CMS actuaries predict the change would save Medicare more than $7 billion in 2027, according to an economic analysis in the Medicare Advantage and Part D Advance Notice.

The rule is likely to face pushback from the health insurance industry, which argues chart reviews are an important tool to ensure payers have a full picture of their members’ health needs.

Still, some major MA payers have signaled they’re open to curbing the role of chart reviews and health risk assessments in risk scoring.

And pressure has been mounting on the Trump administration to act amid growing research, investigations and media reports suggesting that insurer gaming fuels tens of billions of dollars in MA overpayments.

The proposed updates will “bring renewed stability to Medicare Advantage … by strengthening public trust in the program such that plans are forced to compete on the value they provide,” Alec Aramanda, the principal deputy director of the Center for Medicare, said in a call to discuss the advance notice late Monday afternoon.

“That’s instead of an arms race based on who can game the system better than the competition,” he added.

Regulators also proposed a small average rate bump — less than 0.1% — for MA plans next year. That equates to more than $700 million more flowing to MA plans.

Final payments will be higher after insurers code for their members’ conditions. CMS actuaries said payments will be 2.5% higher in 2027 than in 2026 after coding is factored in.

Still, the largely flat rate update is well below what industry analysts expected. MA watchers expected payment rates to be about 4% to 6% higher next year, due to sharp growth in Medicare’s underlying medical spending, the generous rate increase handed out by regulators for 2026 and the assumption that the Trump administration would be unwilling to antagonize the health insurance industry in advance of the midterm elections.

Influential payer lobby AHIP slammed the rule and threatened it would result in benefit cuts and higher costs for the 35 million seniors in the program.

MA is already seeing a contraction as major carriers cut benefits and exit underperforming markets in a bid to improve their margins after years of unexpectedly high costs. The changes have caused confusion and uncommonly high plan-switching for seniors for 2026, experts say.

The Alliance of Community Health Plans, an association representing nonprofit local payers, agreed, called the advance notice “disappointing and wholly unrealistic.”

Still, ACHP said it appreciated the CMS’ focus on curbing upcoding in MA, calling the exclusion of unlinked chart reviews from risk scores a “welcome step.”

CMS regulators said the payment rate reflects higher costs, and that the risk adjustment changes would ensure the long-term viability of the program.

The Trump administration is working toward an MA risk adjustment system that’s more simple, competitive and accurate — one that will equalize the playing field between insurers “regardless of size or resources,” Aramanda said.

Still, payment rates could tick up in the final payment rule after sustained lobbying from unhappy health insurers.

“To state the obvious, expect intense advocacy efforts/negative messaging from the carriers,” Jefferies analyst David Windley wrote in a Monday note on the rule. Otherwise, “expect plans to cut benefits substantially.”

Reworking risk adjustment

The federal government adjusts payments to MA plans based on the health needs of their members. Basically, payments are higher when a member is sicker and lower when a member is healthy. This system is meant to stop insurers from cherry-picking healthy enrollees, but also creates an incentive for them to exaggerate how sick their members are, including through intense documentation of their conditions.

link