September 30, 2025

The Health

Your health, your choice

Barriers and facilitators to utilizing digital health technologies by healthcare professionals

Barriers and facilitators to utilizing digital health technologies by healthcare professionals

  • Beer, P. & Mulder, R. H. The effects of technological developments on work and their implications for continuous vocational education and training: a systematic review. Front. Psychol. 11, 918 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronsoler, A., Doyle, J. & Van Reenen J. The Impact of New Technology on the Healthcare Workforce. 60. Available at https://workofthefuture.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/2020-Research-Brief-Bronsoler-Doyle-VanReenen.pdf.

  • Borges do Nascimento, I. J. et al. The global effect of digital health technologies on health workers’ competencies and health workplace: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and lexical-based and sentence-based meta-analysis. Lancet Digit Health 5, e534–e544 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Electronic Health Records Survey public use file national weighted estimates—NEHRS Survey Results and Products (2019). https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nehrs/2019NEHRS-PUF-weighted-estimates-508.pdf.

  • Fischer, S. H., Ray, K. N., Mehrotra, A., Bloom, E. L. & Uscher-Pines, L. Prevalence and Characteristics of Telehealth Utilization in the United States. JAMA Netw. Open 3, e2022302 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. N. et al. A Study to See the Effect of Social Media Usage Among Healthcare Providers. Cureus 13, e16350.

  • Christopher Gibbons, M. Use of health information technology among racial and ethnic underserved communities. Perspect. Health Inf. Manag 8, 1f (2011).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. et al. Academia-industry digital health collaborations: a cross-cultural analysis of barriers and facilitators. Digit Health 5, 2055207619878627 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Samarasekera, U. The rise of racial minority health apps. Lancet Digit Health 4, e218–e219 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinzant, D. H. & Vinzant, J. C. Strategy and organizational capacity: finding a fit. Public Product. Manag. Rev. 20, 139–157 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie-Tremblay, M., Aubry, M., Richer, M.-C. & Cyr, G. A health care project management office’s strategies for continual change and continuous improvement. Health Care Manag (Frederick) 37, 4–10 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickens, S. & Solak, J. Successful healthcare programs and projects: organization portfolio management essentials. J. Health. Inf. Manag 19, 19–27 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. Global Strategy on Digital Health (WHO, 2020–2025).

  • Regional Committee for Europe, 72nd session. Seventy-second Regional Committee for Europe: Tel Aviv, 12–14 September 2022: Regional digital health action plan for the WHO European Region 2023–2030. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe (2022).

  • Schreiweis, B. et al. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of ehealth services: systematic literature analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 21, e14197 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Weißenfeld, M. M., Goetz, K. & Steinhäuser, J. Facilitators and barriers for the implementation of telemedicine from a local government point of view – a cross-sectional survey in Germany. BMC Health Serv. Res. 21, 919 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimbo, M. et al. Perceived barriers and facilitators of using a Web-based interactive decision aid for colorectal cancer screening in community practice settings: findings from focus groups with primary care clinicians and medical office staff. J. Med. Internet Res. 15, e286 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Addotey-Delove, M., Scott, R. E. & Mars, M. Healthcare workers’ perspectives of mHealth adoption factors in the developing world: scoping review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public health 20, 1244 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Adepoju, I.-O. O., Albersen, B. J. A., De Brouwere, V., van Roosmalen, J. & Zweekhorst, M. mHealth for clinical decision-making in Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 5, e38 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkhaldi, O., McMillan, B., Maddah, N. & Ainsworth, J. Interventions aimed at enhancing health care providers’ behavior toward the prescription of mobile health apps: systematic review. JMIR mHealth uHealth 11, e43561 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Rawashdeh, M., Keikhosrokiani, P., Belaton, B., Alawida, M. & Zwiri, A. IoT Adoption and application for smart healthcare: a systematic review. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 22 (2022).

  • Agarwal, S., Perry, H. B., Long, L.-A. & Labrique, A. B. Evidence on feasibility and effective use of mHealth strategies by frontline health workers in developing countries: systematic review. Trop. Med. Int. Health 20, 1003–1014 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Amoakoh-Coleman, M. et al. Effectiveness of mHealth interventions targeting health care workers to improve pregnancy outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 18, e226 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Arsad, F. S. et al. The impact of eHealth applications in healthcare intervention: a systematic review. J. Health Res. 37 (2023).

  • Aslani, N. et al. Advantages and challenges of telecardiology and providing solutions for its successful implementation: a scoping review. Int. Cardiovascular Res. J. 16 (2022).

  • Avoka, C. K., McArthur, E. & Banke-Thomas, A. Interventions to improve obstetric emergency referral decision making, communication, and feedback between health facilities in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Tropical Med. Int. Health (2022).

  • Baluszek, J. B., Wiig, S., Myrnes-Hansen, K. V. & Bronnick, K. K. Specialized healthcare practitioners’ challenges in performing video consultations to patients in Nordic Countries—a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Health Serv. Res. 22, 1432 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bervell, B. & Al-Samarraie, H. A comparative review of mobile health and electronic health utilization in sub-Saharan African countries. Soc. Sci. Med. 232, 1–16 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra, A. & Broekhuis, M. Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Serv. Res. 10, 231 (2010).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brommeyer, M., Whittaker, M., Mackay, M., Ng, F. & Liang, Z. Building health service management workforce capacity in the era of health informatics and digital health—a scoping review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 169, 104909 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, R., Catalani, C., Wimbush, J. & Israelski, D. Community health workers and mobile technology: a systematic review of the literature. PLoS ONE 8, e65772 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, L., Mountain, G., Wessels, B., Kelly, C. & Hawley, M. Factors affecting front line staff acceptance of telehealth technologies: a mixed-method systematic review. J. Adv. Nurs. 70, 21–33 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., Pope, N., Bosco, A. M., Mason, J. & Morgan, A. Issues affecting nurses’ capability to use digital technology at work: an integrative review. J. Clin. Nurs. 29, 2801–2819 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Calleja, P., Wilkes, S., Spencer, M. & Woodbridge, S. Telehealth use in rural and remote health practitioner education: an integrative review. Rural Remote Health 22 (2022).

  • Cansdale, L. G. et al. Can mHealth improve recording of birth outcomes in LMICs—a scoping review. BJOG: Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 129, 98–99 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartolovni, A., Tomicic, A. & Lazic Mosler, E. Ethical, legal, and social considerations of AI-based medical decision-support tools: a scoping review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 161, 104738 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Celes, R. S., Rossi, T. R. A., De Barros, S. G., Santos, C. M. L. & Cardoso, C. Telehealth as state response strategy: systematic review. Rev. Panam. Salud Publica Pan Am. J. Public Health 42 (2018).

  • Cen, Z. F. et al. Systematic literature review of adopting eHealth in pharmaceutical care during COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations for strengthening pharmacy services. BMJ Open 12, e066246 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, W. S. & Leung, A. Y. Use of social network sites for communication among health professionals: systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 20, e117 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. et al. Acceptance of clinical artificial intelligence among physicians and medical students: a systematic review with cross-sectional survey. Front. Med. 9, 990604 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. F., Moller, A. M., Hansen, J. P., Nielsen, C. T. & Gildberg, F. A. Patients’ and providers’ experiences with video consultations used in the treatment of older patients with unipolar depression: a systematic review. J. Psychiatr. Ment. Health Nurs. 27, 258–271 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • da Costa, C. B., Peralta, F. D. S. & Ferreira de Mello, A. L. S. How has teledentistry been applied in public dental health services? An integrative review. Telemed. J. E Health 26, 945–954 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • de Grood, C., Raissi, A., Kwon, Y. & Santana, M. J. Adoption of e-health technology by physicians: a scoping review. J. Multidiscip. Health 9, 335–344 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Drissi, N. et al. A systematic literature review on e-mental health solutions to assist health care workers during COVID-19. Telemed. J. E Health 27, 594–602 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, B. & Hwang, H.-G. The adoption of electronic medical record by physicians: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 99, e19290 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Early, J., Gonzalez, C., Gordon-Dseagu, V. & Robles-Calderon, L. Use of mobile health (mHealth) technologies and interventions among community health workers globally: a scoping review. Health Promot Pr. 20, 805–817 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebneter, A. S., Sauter, T. C., Christen, A. & Eychmueller, S. Feasibility, acceptability and needs in telemedicine for palliative care. Swiss Med. Wkly. 152, w30148 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmett, A., Kent, B., James, A. & March-McDonald, J. Experiences of health professionals towards using mobile electrocardiogram (ECG) technology: a qualitative systematic review. J. Clini. Nursing (2022).

  • Ferdousi, R., Arab-Zozani, M., Tahamtan, I., Rezaei-Hachesu, P. & Dehghani, M. Attitudes of nurses towards clinical information systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Nurs. Rev. 68, 59–66 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, E. et al. Workload and workflow implications associated with the use of electronic clinical decision support tools used by health professionals in general practice: a scoping review. BMC Prim. Care 24, 23 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ftouni, R., AlJardali, B., Hamdanieh, M., Ftouni, L. & Salem, N. Challenges of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 22, 207 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, M.-P. et al. Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. J. Med Syst. 36, 241–277 (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, M.-P., Ngangue, P., Payne-Gagnon, J. & Desmartis, M. m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review. J. Am. Med Inf. Assoc. 23, 212–220 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, K. V. et al. Considering clinician competencies for the implementation of artificial intelligence–based tools in health care: findings from a scoping review. JMIR Med. Informatics 10 (2022).

  • Garavand, A., Aslani, N., Nadri, H., Abedini, S. & Dehghan, S. Acceptance of telemedicine technology among physicians: a systematic review. Informatics Med. Unlocked 30 (2022).

  • Ghimire, S., Martinez, S., Hartvigsen, G. & Gerdes, M. Virtual prenatal care: a systematic review of pregnant women’s and healthcare professionals’ experiences, needs, and preferences for quality care. Int. J. Med. Informatics 170 (2023).

  • Gonçalves, R. L. et al. Usability in telehealth systems for non-communicable diseases attention in primary care, from the COVID-19 pandemic onwards: a systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. (2023).

  • Grant, C., Jones, A. & Land, H. What are the perspectives of speech pathologists, occupational therapists and physiotherapists on using telehealth videoconferencing for service delivery to children with developmental delays? A systematic review of the literature. Aust. J. Rural Health 30, 321–336 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagström, J. et al. Views, use, and experiences of web-based access to pediatric electronic health records for children, adolescents, and parents: scoping review. J. Med. Internet Res. 24 (2022).

  • Huang, R., Li, H., Suomi, R., Li, C. & Peltoniemi, T. Intelligent physical robots in health care: systematic literature review. J. Med. Internet Res. 25 (2023).

  • Ionescu, A., De Jong, P. G. M., Drop, S. L. S. & Van Kampen, S. C. A scoping review of the use of e-learning and e-consultation for healthcare workers in low- and middle-income countries and their potential complementarity. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 29, 713–722 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Isidori, V. et al. Digital technologies and the role of health care professionals: scoping review exploring nurses’ skills in the digital era and in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic. JMIR Nurs. 5, e37631 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismatullaev, U. V. U. & Kim, S. H. Review of the factors affecting acceptance of AI-infused systems. Human Factors. (2022).

  • Jacob, C., Sanchez-Vazquez, A. & Ivory, C. Social, organizational, and technological factors impacting clinicians’ adoption of mobile health tools: systematic literature review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 8, e15935 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez, G. et al. Digital health competencies for primary healthcare professionals: a scoping review. Int. J. Med. Informatics 143 (2020).

  • Jimma, B. L. & Enyew, D. B. Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records from the perspective of physicians and nurses: a scoping review. Inform. Med. unlocked 31, 100991 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Joo, J. Y. Nurse-led telehealth interventions during COVID-19: a scoping review. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 40, 804–813 (2022).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonasdottir, S. K., Thordardottir, I. & Jonsdottir, T. Health professionals? Perspective towards challenges and opportunities of telehealth service provision: a scoping review. Int. J. Med. Informatics 167 (2022).

  • Jose, A., Tortorella, G. L., Vassolo, R., Kumar, M. & Mac Cawley, A. F. Professional competence and its effect on the implementation of healthcare 4.0 technologies: scoping review and future research directions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 20, 478 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, H. et al. Opportunities and challenges for professionals in psychiatry and mental health care using digital technologies during the COVID-19 pandemic: systematic review. JMIR Human Factors 9 (2022).

  • Zhang, K. K. & Thompson, A. W. Effectiveness of electronic learning for continuing interprofessional education on behavior change of healthcare professionals: a scoping review. J. Interprofessional Care 1–11. (2022)

  • Keyworth, C., Hart, J., Armitage, C. J. & Tully, M. P. What maximizes the effectiveness and implementation of technology-based interventions to support healthcare professional practice? A systematic literature review. BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Mak. 18, 93 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivunen, M. & Saranto, K. Nursing professionals’ experiences of the facilitators and barriers to the use of telehealth applications: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 32, 24–44 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolla, A., Lim, S., Zanowiak, J. & Islam, N. The role of health informatics in facilitating communication strategies for community health workers in clinical settings: a scoping review. J. Public Health Manag Pr. 27, E107–E118 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Konnyu, K. J. et al. Changes to prenatal care visit frequency and telehealth: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Obstet. Gynecol. 141, 299–323 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, C. S. et al. Physician burnout and the electronic health record leading up to and during the first year of Covid-19: systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 24 (2022).

  • Laar, A. S., Harris, M. L., Shifti, D. M. & Loxton, D. Perspectives of health care professionals’ on delivering mHealth sexual and reproductive health services in rural settings in low-and-middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic review. BMC Health Services Research 22 (2022).

  • Lam, K. et al. Machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a systematic review. NPJ digital Med. 5, 24 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampickienė, I. & Davoody, N. Healthcare professionals’ experience of performing digital care visits—a scoping review. Life (Basel, Switzerland) 12 (2022).

  • Li, J., Talaei-Khoei, A., Seale, H., Ray, P. & Macintyre, C. R. Health care provider adoption of ehealth: systematic literature review. Interact. J. Med. Res. 2, e7 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L. & Cotton, A. A systematic review of nurses’ perspectives toward the telemedicine intensive care unit: a basis for supporting its future implementation in China? Telemed. J. E Health 25, 343–350 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lluch, M. Healthcare professionals’ organisational barriers to health information technologies-a literature review. Int. J. Med. Inf. 80, 849–862 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Longhini, J., Rossettini, G. & Palese, A. Correction: digital health competencies among health care professionals: systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 24, e43721 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. et al. The impact of mobile technology on teamwork and communication in hospitals: a systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 26, 339–355 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvaso, G. et al. Virtual and augmented reality as a novel opportunity to unleash the power of radiotherapy in the digital era: a scoping review. Appl. Sci. (Switzerland) 12 (2022).

  • Meunier, P. Y., Raynaud, C., Guimaraes, E., Gueyffier, F. & Letrilliart, L. Barriers and facilitators to the use of clinical decision support systems in primary care: a mixed-methods systematic review. Ann. Fam. Med. 21, 57–69 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, E. C., Tolley, C. L., Bates, D. W. & Slight, S. P. A systematic review of the impact of health information technology on nurses’ time. J. Am. Med Inf. Assoc. 27, 798–807 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhiyaddin, R., Abd-Alrazaq, A. A., Househ, M., Alam, T. & Shah, Z. The Impact of Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) on physicians: a scoping review. Stud. Health Technol. Inf. 272, 470–473 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulita, F., Verras, G. I., Anagnostopoulos, C. N. & Kotis, K. A Smarter health through the internet of surgical things. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 22 (2022).

  • Namasivayam, P. et al. The use of telehealth in the provision of after-hours palliative care services in rural and remote Australia: A scoping review. PLoS ONE 17, e0274861 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nezamdoust, S., Abdekhoda, M., Ranjbaran, F. & Azami-Aghdash, S. Adopting mobile health applications by nurses: a scoping review. J. Res. Nurs. 27, 480–491 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, O. T. et al. A systematic review of contributing factors of and solutions to electronic health record-related impacts on physician well-being. J. Am. Med Inf. Assoc. 28, 974–984 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Niazkhani, Z., Toni, E., Cheshmekaboodi, M., Georgiou, A. & Pirnejad, H. Barriers to patient, provider, and caregiver adoption and use of electronic personal health records in chronic care: a systematic review. BMC Med Inf. Decis. Mak. 20, 153 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, S. et al. Artificial intelligence in nursing and midwifery: a systematic review. J. Clinical Nursing. (2022).

  • Odendaal, W. et al. Health workers’ perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (2020).

  • Osman, M. A. et al. Barriers and facilitators for implementation of electronic consultations (eConsult) to enhance access to specialist care: a scoping review. BMJ Glob. Health 4, e001629 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, I., Koulouglioti, C. & Ali, S. Views of nurses and other health and social care workers on the use of assistive humanoid and animal-like robots in health and social care: a scoping review. Contemp. Nurse 54, 425–442 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Police, R. L., Foster, T. & Wong, K. S. Adoption and use of health information technology in physician practice organisations: systematic review. Inf. Prim. Care 18, 245–258 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, S., Balaji, J. N., Joshi, A. & Surapaneni, K. M. Ethical conundrums in the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare—a scoping review of reviews. J. Personalized Med. 12 (2022).

  • Rahal, R. M., Mercer, J., Kuziemsky, C. & Yaya, S. Factors affecting the mature use of electronic medical records by primary care physicians: a systematic review. BMC Med Inf. Decis. Mak. 21, 67 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, H. J. et al. Barriers and facilitators to the adoption of digital health interventions for COPD management: a scoping review. Heart Lung: J. Crit. Care 59, 117–127 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratshidi, L., Grobbelaar, S. & Botha, A. Conceptualising the factors influencing community health workers’ preparedness for ICT implementation: a systematised scoping review. Sustainability (Switzerland) 14 (2022).

  • Vukušić Rukavina, T. et al. Dangers and benefits of social media on e-professionalism of health care professionals: scoping review. J. Med. Internet Res. 23, e25770 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Saigí-Rubió, F. et al. The current status of telemedicine technology use across the World Health Organization European Region: an overview of systematic reviews. J. Med. Internet Res. 24, e40877 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipanoun, P., Oulton, K., Gibson, F. & Wray, J. The experiences and perceptions of users of an electronic patient record system in a pediatric hospital setting: a systematc review. Int. J. Med. Informatics 160, (2022).

  • Sullivan-Tibbs, M. A. et al. Social work’s response during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review—balancing telemedicine with social work self-care during a pandemic. Soc. Work Public Health 37, 499–509 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabaeeian, R. A., Hajrahimi, B. & Khoshfetrat, A. A systematic review of telemedicine systems use barriers: primary health care providers’ perspective. J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag. (2022).

  • Tegegne, M. D. et al. Electronic medical record system use and determinants in ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Interact. J. Med. Res. 12, e40721 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, C., Heinsch, M., Brosnan, C. & Kay-Lambkin, F. “Another tool in our toolbox”: a scoping review of the use of eHealth technologies in health social work practice. Soc. Work Health Care 62, 1–18 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Castano, A. et al. Ethical, legal, organisational and social issues of teleneurology: a scoping review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 20 (2023).

  • Poissant, L., Pereira, J., Tamblyn, R. & Kawasumi, Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J. Am. Med Inf. Assoc. 12, 505–516 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vejdani, M. et al. Electronic prescription system requirements: a scoping review. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 22, 231 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, P. & Kerrison, R. Patients’ and physicians’ experiences with remote consultations in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-method rapid review of the literature. BJGP Open 6, BJGPO.2021.0192 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wedel, P. & Hagist, C. Economic value of data and analytics for health care providers: Hermeneutic systematic literature review. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, (2020).

  • Walle, A. D. et al. Readiness to use electronic medical record systems and its associated factors among health care professionals in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Inform. Med. Unlocked 36, 101140 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, L., Hong, S. C., Chalakkal, R. J. & Ogbuehi, K. C. A systematic review of current teleophthalmology services in new zealand compared to the four comparable countries of the United Kingdom, Australia, united states of America (USA) and Canada. Clin. Ophthalmol. 15, 4015–4027 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, K., Lyndon, A. & Chesla, C. A. The electronic health record’s impact on nurses’ cognitive work: An integrative review. Int J. Nurs. Stud. 94, 74–84 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Xyrichis, A. et al. Healthcare stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2, CD012876 (2021).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, L. B., Chan, P. S. & Cram, P. Staff acceptance of tele-ICU coverage: a systematic review. Chest 139, 279–288 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakerabasali, S., Ayyoubzadeh, S. M., Baniasadi, T., Yazdani, A. & Abhari, S. Mobile health technology and healthcare providers: systemic barriers to adoption. Health. Inf. Res. 27, 267–278 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Lu, V. & Khanduja, V. The impact of extended reality on surgery: a scoping review. Int. Orthop. 47, 611–621 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z. et al. Smart glasses for supporting distributed care work: systematic review. JMIR Med. Inform. 11, e44161 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. M., Freeman, M., Kaye, J., Vuckovic, N. & Buckley, D. I. A systematic review of clinician and staff views on the acceptability of incorporating remote monitoring technology into primary care. Telemed. J. E Health 20, 428–438 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nizeyimana, E., Joseph, C., Plastow, N., Dawood, G. & Louw, Q. A. A scoping review of feasibility, cost, access to rehabilitation services and implementation of telerehabilitation: Implications for low- and middle-income countries. Digital Health 8 (2022).

  • Thomas Craig, K. J., Willis, V. C., Gruen, D., Rhee, K. & Jackson, G. P. The burden of the digital environment: a systematic review on organization-directed workplace interventions to mitigate physician burnout. J. Am. Med Inf. Assoc. 28, 985–997 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges do Nascimento, I. J. Barriers, facilitators, and recommendations visual mind mapping. https://gitmind.com/app/docs/mv5g6b6x.

  • Svendsen, M. T., Tiedemann, S. N. & Andersen, K. E. Pros and cons of eHealth: a systematic review of the literature and observations in Denmark. SAGE Open Med. 9 (2021).

  • Powell, K. R. Patient-perceived facilitators of and barriers to electronic portal use: a systematic review. Comput. Inf. Nurs. 35, 565–573 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, S. et al. Understanding factors affecting patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Mak. 16, 120 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. G., Pierson, L. & Doernberg, S. The role of medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann. Intern. Med. 173, 145–146 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, A., Klein, E. J., Kollars, K. & Kleinhenz, A. L. W. Medical students are not essential workers: examining institutional responsibility during the COVID-19 pandemic. Acad. Med. (2020)

  • Bower, B. L. & Hardy, K. P. From correspondence to cyberspace: changes and challenges in distance education. N. Directions Community Coll. 2004, 5–12 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethany D. W., Gattenberg R. W., & Freed K. ‘Societal Issues in Distance Learning’, September 2001, University of South Florida and ‘Technological Rug down the Hallways of Distance Education’. Wikipedia (2001).

  • Soumik Sarka. A. Brief History of Online Education. Adamas University (2020).

  • Deepika, V., Soundariya, K., Karthikeyan, K. & Kalaiselvan, G. ‘Learning from home’: role of e-learning methodologies and tools during novel coronavirus pandemic outbreak. Postgrad. Med. J. 97, 590–597 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafton-Clarke, C. et al. Pivot to online learning for adapting or continuing workplace-based clinical learning in medical education following the COVID-19 pandemic: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 70. Med. Teach. 44, 227–243 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jhurree, V. Technology integration in education in developing countries: Guidelines to policy makers. Int. Educ. J. 6, 467–483.

  • Hipkins, C. New digital technologies for schools and kura. The Beehive https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/new-digital-technologies-schools-and-kura.

  • Chang, J. et al. Real-time display of laboratory testing status improves satisfaction levels in an emergency department: A pilot study. J. Clin. Lab Anal. 34, e23290 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Overhage, J. M., Suico, J. & McDonald, C. J. Electronic laboratory reporting: barriers, solutions and findings. J. Public Health Manag. Pr. 7, 60–66 (2001).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROSTAT – Statistics Explained. Cloud computing—statistics on the use by enterprises. (2021).

  • Cismondi, F. et al. Reducing unnecessary lab testing in the ICU with artificial intelligence. Int J. Med. Inf. 82, 345–358 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Noblin, A., Cortelyou-Ward, K. & Servan, R. M. Cloud computing and patient engagement: leveraging available technology. J. Med. Pr. Manag. 30, 89–93 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, M. et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions. Syst. Rev. 8, 335 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, M. J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372, n71 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins J. P. T. et al. (eds) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3. (Cochrane, 2022). Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.

  • Fusar-Poli, P. & Radua, J. Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews. Evid. Based Ment. Health 21, 95–100 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, J. E. & Laine, C. The science and art of deduction: complex systematic overviews. Ann. Intern. Med. 148, 786–788 (2008).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. Digital Health—draft Resolution Proposed by Algeria, Australia, Brazil, Estonia, Ethiopia, Germany, India, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, Luxembourg, Mauritius, Morocco, Panama, Philippines and South Africa (WHO, 2018).

  • World Health Organization. WHO Guideline: Recommendations on Digital Interventions for Health System Strengthening (WHO, 2019).

  • Jiang, Y. et al. Predicting peritoneal recurrence and disease-free survival from CT images in gastric cancer with multitask deep learning: a retrospective study. Lancet Digit Health 4, e340–e350 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkateswaran, M. et al. A digital health registry with clinical decision support for improving quality of antenatal care in Palestine (eRegQual): a pragmatic, cluster-randomised, controlled, superiority trial. Lancet Digit Health 4, e126–e136 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Covidence systematic review software. Melbourne, Australia: Veritas Health Innovation. www.covidence.org. Covidence.

  • Shea, B. J. et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ 358, j4008 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Microsoft Corporation. (2018). Microsoft Excel. Retrieved from https://office.microsoft.com/excel.

  • van Eck, N. J. & Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84, 523–538 (2010).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. & Harden, A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 8, 45 (2008).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, A., Flemming, K., McInnes, E., Oliver, S. & Craig, J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 12, 181 (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, K. & Bazeley, P. Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. (3rd Edition) (Sage Publications, 2019).

  • Borges do Nascimento, I. J. et al. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: an overview of systematic reviews. BMC Infect. Dis. 21, 525 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, S. et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series. Implement Sci. 13, 2 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • link