Stoumpos AI, Kitsios F, Talias MA. Digital transformation in healthcare: technology acceptance and its applications. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4):3407.
Google Scholar
Rousseau DM, McCarthy S. Educating managers from an evidence-based perspective. Acad Manage Learn Educ. 2007;6(1):84–101.
Google Scholar
Demirdjian G. A 10-year hospital-based health technology assessment program in a public hospital in Argentina. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015;31(1–2):103–10.
Google Scholar
Bertram M, Dhaene G, Tan-Torres Edejer T. & World Health Organization. Institutionalizing health technology assessment mechanisms: a how to guide. 2021.
Starey N. What is clinical governance? 2003.
Macfarlane AJ. R. What is clinical governance? BJA Educ. 2019;19(6):174–5.
Google Scholar
Bishop V, Scott I. Challenges in Clinical Practice: Professional developments in nursing. Bloomsbury Publishing; 2001.
Reay T, Berta W, Kohn MK. What’s the evidence on evidence-based management? Acad Manage Perspect. 2009;23(4):5–18.
Google Scholar
Donaldson L. Clinical governance: a quality concept. In Clinical governance in primary care.2018;1–16. CRC.
Ouchi WG. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Manage Sci. 1979;25(9):833–48.
Google Scholar
Lebas MJ. Performance measurement and performance management. Int J Prod Econ. 1995;41(1–3):23–35.
Google Scholar
Malmi T, Brown DA. Management control systems as a package—Opportunities, challenges and research directions. Manage Acc Res. 2008;19(4):287–300.
Google Scholar
Ferreira A, Otley D. The design and use of performance management systems: an extended framework for analysis. Manage Acc Res. 2009;20(4):263–82.
Google Scholar
Hood C. A public management for all seasons? Public Adm. 1991;69(1):3–19.
Google Scholar
Van Dooren W, Bouckaert G, Halligan J. Performance management in the public sector. USA & Canada: Routledge; 2015.
Nuti S, Noto G, Vola F, Vainieri M. Let’s play the patients music: A new generation of performance measurement systems in healthcare. Manag Decis. 2018;56(10):2252–72.
Google Scholar
Donaldson LJ, Gray JAM. Clinical governance: a quality duty for health organisations. Qual Health Care. 1998;7:S37–44.
Google Scholar
Adivar B, Hüseyinoğlu IÖY, Christopher M. A quantitative performance management framework for assessing omnichannel retail supply chains. J Retailing Consumer Serv. 2019;48:257–69.
Google Scholar
Sibanda J. Investigating the changing role of key performance indicators for technology and project management entities (Doctoral dissertation, North-West University (South Africa)). 2022.
Vainieri M, Ferrè F, Manetti S. An integrated framework to measure the performance of inter-organizational programme on health technology assessment. Sustainability. 2021;13(7):3873.
Google Scholar
Noto G, Prenestini A, Cosenz F, Barresi G. Tackling wicked problems in performance management and governance of public health: an empirical analysis of COVID-19 vaccination strategies. Int J Public Sector Manag. 2023;36(2):130–51.
Google Scholar
O’Rourke B, Oortwijn W, Schuller T. The new definition of health technology assessment: A milestone in international collaboration. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020;36(3):187–90.
Google Scholar
Pfannstiel MA, Rasche C. Service design and service thinking in healthcare and hospital management. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2019.
Ijzerman MJ, Steuten LM. Early assessment of medical technologies to inform product development and market access: a review of methods and applications. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011;9:331–47.
Google Scholar
Grutters JP, Kluytmans A, van der Wilt GJ, Tummers M. Methods for early assessment of the societal value of health technologies: a scoping review and proposal for classification. Value Health. 2022;25(7):1227–34.
Google Scholar
Manetti S, Lettieri E, Ni MZ. Development and validation of medical device key evidence tool (‘medket’): an evidence-based framework to explain success in selected European and US companies. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(7):e0288126.
Google Scholar
Manetti S, Guidotti E, Vola FV, Vainieri M. A systematic literature review of Real-World evidence (RWE) on post-market assessment of medical devices. Health Policy Law. 2023;13:1–33.
Ijzerman MJ, Steuten LM. Early assessment of medical technologies to inform product development and market access: a review of methods and applications. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011;9:331–47.
IJzerman MJ, Koffijberg H, Fenwick E, Krahn M. Emerging use of early health technology assessment in medical product development: a scoping review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017;35:727–40.
Vis C, Bührmann L, Riper H, Ossebaard HC. Health technology assessment frameworks for eHealth: A systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020;36(3):204–16.
Google Scholar
Bryan S, Mitton C, Donaldson C. Breaking the addiction to technology adoption. Health Econ. 2014;23(4):379–83.
Google Scholar
Henshall C, Mardhani-Bayne L, Frønsdal KB, Klemp M. Interactions between health technology assessment, coverage, and regulatory processes: emerging issues, goals, and opportunities. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(3):253–60.
Google Scholar
Bobini M, Cicchetti A. Integrating environmental sustainability into health technology assessment: an international survey of HTA stakeholders. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024;40(1):e64.
Carrera A, Manetti S, Lettieri E. Rewiring care delivery through digital therapeutics (DTx): a machine learning-enhanced assessment and development (M-LEAD) framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024;24(1):237.
Google Scholar
Benedetto V, Ferrè F, Nuti S. Including environmental and social sustainability in the planning process of healthcare services: A case study of cancer screening programs in an inner area in Italy. Health Policy. 2024;144:105074.
Google Scholar
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 of the European parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2021 on health technology assessment and amending directive 2011/24/EU2021 22.12.2021. Available from:https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32021R2282&from=EN.
Drummond M, Tarricone R, Torbica A. European union regulation of health technology assessment: what is required for it to succeed? Eur J Health Econ. 2022;23(6):913–5.
Google Scholar
Nicholls S, Cullen R, O’Neill S, Halligan A. Clinical governance: its origins and its foundations. Br J Clin Gov. 2000;5(3):172–8.
Google Scholar
Hofmann S, Branner J, Misra A, Lintener H. A review of current approaches to defining and valuing innovation in health technology assessment. Value Health. 2021;24(12):1773–83.
Google Scholar
Nyanchoka L, Tudur-Smith C, Iversen V, Tricco AC, Porcher R. A scoping review describes methods used to identify, prioritize and display gaps in health research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;109:99–110.
Google Scholar
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135.
Google Scholar
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467–73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850.
Google Scholar
Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of pubmed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22(2):338–42.
Google Scholar
Hebert M. Telehealth success: evaluation framework development. In MEDINFO 2001. IOS Press. 2001;1145–9.
Barlow J. Managing innovation in healthcare. London: World Scientific Publishing Company; 2016.
Ahumada-Canale A, Jeet V, Bilgrami A, Seil E, Gu Y, Cutler H. Barriers and facilitators to implementing priority setting and resource allocation tools in hospital decisions: A systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2023;322:115790.
Google Scholar
Lettieri E, Masella C, Nocco U. Budgeting and health technology assessment: first evidence obtained from proposal forms used to submit the adoption of new technology. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24(4):502–10.
Google Scholar
Lettieri E. Uncertainty inclusion in budgeting technology adoption at a hospital level: evidence from a multiple case study. Health Policy. 2009;93(2–3):128–36.
Google Scholar
Seixas BV, Regier DA, Bryan S, Mitton C. Describing practices of priority setting and resource allocation in publicly funded health care systems of high-income countries. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21:1–15.
Google Scholar
Polisena J, Clifford T, Elshaug AG, Mitton C, Russell E, Skidmore B. Case studies that illustrate disinvestment and resource allocation decision-making processes in health care: a systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29(2):174–84.
Google Scholar
Mitton C, Dionne F, Donaldson C. Managing healthcare budgets in times of austerity: the role of program budgeting and marginal analysis. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014;12:95–102.
Google Scholar
Haas M, Hall J, Viney R, Gallego G. Breaking up is hard to do: why disinvestment in medical technology is harder than investment. Aust Health Rev. 2012;36(2):148–52.
Google Scholar
Seixas BV, Dionne F, Mitton C. Practices of decision making in priority setting and resource allocation: a scoping review and narrative synthesis of existing frameworks. Health Econ Rev. 2021;11:1–11.
Google Scholar
Mascii L, Luschi A, Iadanza E. Sentiment analysis for performance evaluation of maintenance in healthcare. In International Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering. Cham: Springer International Publishing: 2021; pp. 359–367.
Andellini M, Faggiano F, Picardo SG, Testa G, Perrotta D, Bianchi R, Ritrovato M. Health technology assessment of intensive care ventilators for pediatric patients. Children. 2021;8(11):986.
Google Scholar
Tomaiuolo R, Restelli U, Faggiano FC, Di Resta C, Bitar Nehme A, Giuliani S, Ritrovato F. Health technology assessment to employ COVID-19 serological tests as companion diagnostics in the vaccination campaign against SARS-CoV-2. Clin Chem Lab Med (CCLM). 2022;60(9):1463–77.
Google Scholar
Goetghebeur MM, Wagner M, Khoury H, Levitt RJ, Erickson LJ, Rindress D. Bridging health technology assessment (HTA) and efficient health care decision making with multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) applying the EVIDEM framework to medicines appraisal. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(2):376–88.
Google Scholar
Miniati R, Dori F, Cecconi G, Gusinu R, Niccolini F, Gentili G. B. HTA decision support system for sustainable business continuity management in hospitals. The case of surgical activity at the university hospital in Florence. Technol Health Care. 2013;21(1):49–61.
Google Scholar
Lim ME, Nye T, Bowen JM, Hurley J, Goeree R, Tarride JE. Mathematical modeling: the case of emergency department waiting times. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28(2):93–109.
Google Scholar
Oliveira MD, Mataloto I, Kanavos P. Multi-criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment: addressing methodological challenges to improve the state of the Art. Eur J Health Econ. 2019;20:891–918.
Google Scholar
Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Q. 1966;44(3):166–206.
Google Scholar
Carini E, Gabutti I, Frisicale EM, Di Pilla A, Pezzullo AM, De Waure C, Specchia ML. Assessing hospital performance indicators. What dimensions? Evidence from an umbrella review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:1–13.
Google Scholar
Johansen B, Mainz J, Sabroe S, Manniche C, Leboeuf-Yde C. Quality improvement in an outpatient department for subacute low back pain patients: prospective surveillance by outcome and performance measures in a health technology assessment perspective. Spine. 2004;29(8):925–31.
Google Scholar
Garrido MV, Gerhardus A, Røttingen JA, Busse R. Developing health technology assessment to address health care system needs. Health Policy. 2010;94(3):196–202.
Google Scholar
Cionini L, Gardani G, Gabriele P, Magri S, Morosini PL, Rosi A, Indicators IW. G. G. Quality indicators in radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2007;82(2):191–200.
Google Scholar
Longworth L, Rowen D. Mapping to obtain EQ-5D utility values for use in NICE health technology assessments. Value Health. 2013;16(1):202–10.
Google Scholar
Palozzi G, Brunelli S, Falivena C. Higher sustainability and lower opportunistic behaviour in healthcare: A new framework for performing hospital-based health technology assessment. Sustainability. 2018;10(10):3550.
Google Scholar
Lafortune L, Farand L, Mondou I, Sicotte C, Battista R. Assessing the performance of health technology assessment organizations: A framework. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24(1):76–86.
Google Scholar
Pwee KH, Chow WL. Hospital-based HTA in a public-sector tertiary hospital in Singapore. Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment: The Next Frontier for Health Technology Assessment. 2016;273–282.
Cangelosi M, Chahar A, Eggington S. Evolving use of health technology assessment in medical device Procurement—Global systematic review: an ISPOR special interest group report. Value Health. 2023;26(11):1581–9.
Google Scholar
Romeo P, Lo Re G, Cester R, Picone D, Di Mauro DM, Privitera G, Midiri M. Radiologic team performance index: A new paradigm in KPI evaluating radiology examination volumes department performance: results of Sicilian regional healthcare system survey. Int J Healthc Manag. 2020;13(sup1):145–55.
Google Scholar
Fasterholdt I, Naghavi-Behzad M, Rasmussen BS, Kjølhede T, Skjøth MM, Hildebrandt MG, Kidholm K. Value assessment of artificial intelligence in medical imaging: a scoping review. BMC Med Imaging. 2022;22(1):187.
Google Scholar
Vărzaru AA. An empirical framework for assessing the balanced scorecard impact on sustainable development in healthcare performance measurement. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(22):15155.
Google Scholar
Welzel C, Cotte F, Wekenborg M, Vasey B, McCulloch P, Gilbert S. Holistic human-serving digitization of health care needs integrated automated system-level assessment tools. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e50158.
Brenner M, Weir A, McCann M, Doyle C, Hughes M, Moen A, McCabe C. Development of the key performance indicators for digital health interventions: A scoping review. Digit Health. 2023;9:20552076231152160.
Google Scholar
Hollingworth S, Fenny AP, Yu SY, et al. Health technology assessment in sub-Saharan Africa: a descriptive analysis and narrative synthesis. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021;19:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-021-00293-5.
Google Scholar
Uzochukwu BSC, Okeke C, O’Brien N, et al. Health technology assessment and priority setting for universal health coverage: a qualitative study of stakeholders’ capacity, needs, policy areas of demand and perspectives in Nigeria. Global Health. 2020;16:58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00583-2.
Google Scholar
Joore M, Grimm S, Boonen A, de Wit M, Guillemin F, Fautrel B. Health technology assessment: a framework. RMD Open. 2020;6(3):e001289.
De Belvis AG, Meregaglia M, Morsella A, Adduci A, Perilli A, Cascini F, Solipaca A, Fattore G, Ricciardi W, Maresso A, Scarpetti G. Italy: health system review. Health Syst Transition. 2022;23(4):i–203.
The Commonwealth Fund. International Profiles of Health Care Systems. 2020: pp 1-228. Available at 2020.
Tarricone, R., Amatucci, F., Armeni, P., Banks, H., Borsoi, L., Callea, G., … Marletta,M. Establishing a national HTA program for medical devices in Italy: Overhauling a fragmented system to ensure value and equal access to new medical technologies. Health Policy. 2021;125(5):602–608.
Homauni A, Markazi-Moghaddam N, Mosadeghkhah A, Noori M, Abbasiyan K, Jame S. Z. B. Budgeting in healthcare systems and organizations: A systematic review. Iran J Public Health. 2023;52(9):1889–901. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v52i9.13571.
Google Scholar
O’Reilly D, Audas R, Campbell K, Vanstone M, Bowen JM, Schwartz L, Assasi N, Goeree R. Evidence-Based Decision Making 3: Health Technology Assessment. Methods Mol Biol. 2021; 2249:429–454. PMID: 33871857.
link